Arctic Monkeys Forum Fan Site - Arctic-Monkeys.com

by **arctic** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:00 pm

brownie wrote:are they releasing a movie or not
it would be a good idea but egotistical

Who in the world uses that word in context?
At least if your going to try and sound good use capitals and punctuation, then I'd believe you actually enjoy using that word :milton:

by **brownie** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:49 pm

eh, im not a good speler youth

by **Bijoux** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:45 pm

i swear they actually love themselves..

Wouldn't you if you were an Arctic Monkey?

by **brownie** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 5:25 pm

Bijoux wrote:
i swear they actually love themselves..

Wouldn't you if you were an Arctic Monkey?

no, id honour myself but they are doing to much media stuff and not enough music :!:

by **surrey_casual** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:59 pm

Princess Raya wrote:yer...its slightly egotistical innit?...

agreed, but over bands do it, oasis, libertines, etc etc, but in different ways to amount a bigger fortune, cos remember there is a certain point in a bands career, where they forget about the fans and think right lets make some real cash out of this.

by **arctic** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:00 pm

brownie wrote:no, id honour myself but they are doing to much media stuff and not enough music

What the hell are you on about?
What media stuff?

As far as I know they have released more music than any other band I know of aswell as AVOIDING the media spotlight.

Have I missed something for the past year? :milton:

by **surrey_casual** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:03 pm

also they have only released 2 songs from the album. and are always writing new material, its a step forward unlike kooks and kaiser cheifs that exploit the bands fanbase by selling too many singles knowing they will buy.

by **AlisonFasheeta** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:09 pm

surrey_casual wrote:also they have only released 2 songs from the album. and are always writing new material, its a step forward unlike kooks and kaiser cheifs that exploit the bands fanbase by selling too many singles knowing they will buy.

That's true. There's no point in releasing like 7 singles on a 13 track album. It's just milking it for all it's worth. All you really need is one good song, and everyone will buy it and hear all your songs.

I like how the monks are rolling along. And if that brownie is talking about Scummy Man, that didn't really promote the band at all, just there music. It's just a movie., so I don't know what you mean either.

by **Space Invader** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:31 pm

still IMO i think that they should have released Mardy Bum and Dancing Shoes - the world needs to hear them, they are classic songs that would do very well as singles...

4 singles from an album isn't unreasonable and it would have meant more B-Sides, possibly re-recordings of Demo songs that we all love

by **arctic** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:42 am

Space Invader wrote:still IMO i think that they should have released Mardy Bum and Dancing Shoes - the world needs to hear them, they are classic songs that would do very well as singles...

4 singles from an album isn't unreasonable and it would have meant more B-Sides, possibly re-recordings of Demo songs that we all love

I suppose they could have just HIT us with songs.
I.e released 4 songs in a short space of time.
While they were on tour just release singles for the heck of it. Get it over and done with. But then again it could strecth the album and wear off it's exclusivity.

by **AlisonFasheeta** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:27 am

Space Invader wrote:still IMO i think that they should have released Mardy Bum and Dancing Shoes - the world needs to hear them, they are classic songs that would do very well as singles...

4 singles from an album isn't unreasonable and it would have meant more B-Sides, possibly re-recordings of Demo songs that we all love

Mardy Bum's probably my least favorite song. Don't know why, but I got sick of it really quick. I love everything else more and more everytime I hear it, but Mardy Bum went in reverse. I used to love it. :roll:

by **now-then-mardy-bum** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:18 am

AlisonFasheeta wrote:
Space Invader wrote:still IMO i think that they should have released Mardy Bum and Dancing Shoes - the world needs to hear them, they are classic songs that would do very well as singles...

4 singles from an album isn't unreasonable and it would have meant more B-Sides, possibly re-recordings of Demo songs that we all love

Mardy Bum's probably my least favorite song. Don't know why, but I got sick of it really quick. I love everything else more and more everytime I hear it, but Mardy Bum went in reverse. I used to love it.

Mardy Bum went in reverse...and hit that deer :milton:

possibly

Ok, I'll shut up now... :roll:

by **brownie** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:40 pm

arctic wrote:
brownie wrote:no, id honour myself but they are doing to much media stuff and not enough music

What the hell are you on about?
What media stuff?

As far as I know they have released more music than any other band I know of aswell as AVOIDING the media spotlight.

Have I missed something for the past year?

pardon, i didnt mean MEDIA i mean they are literally everywhere you see,and theyve only released 1 album

by **arctic** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:54 pm

brownie wrote:pardon, i didnt mean MEDIA i mean they are literally everywhere you see,and theyve only released 1 album

Well why didn't you say that properly :lol:

They are a good band that's why.

by **brownie** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:56 pm

i dont speak, properly, im from mansfield mate,and they are a very good band, yes , they are my 2nd favourite

Arctic Monkeys Forum Fan Site - Arctic-Monkeys.com

Arctic Monkeys - The Movie

Who is online